Case Study of Joao Olivera-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Case Study of Joao Olivera. Answer: Case Analysis Considering the dilemma being faced by Mr. Olivera, it can be said that he should consider what is more precious and desirable to him and base his decisions on the same. The Utilitarianism Theory, which states that the actions of individuals should be based on what produces the maximum utility rather than the morality of right or wrong can be referred to in this case. The utility of actions can be based on the emotional wellbeing of the people. In this case if Mr. Olivera chooses to stay with his family his emotional well-being will be ensured and will also ensure his mental satisfaction. Another deontological moral theory that can be referred to is the Kants theory, which states that the actions of the individuals are not based on the moralities of right or wrong but the fulfillment of their duties. However, in this case if Kants theory is applied it can be stated that Mr. Oliver would be required to fulfill his duty and move to Argentina away from his family to accept the position offered to him. However, in that case the emotional wellbeing of Mr. Olivera cannot be ensured, therefore making this theory not applicable to this case. Oliveras options It can be noted that the Joao Olivera is a senior manager of the company Consumer Products Firm. He has been the manager of the largest factory of the aforementioned company in Portugal. However, recently Mr. Olivera had been offered the post of manufacturing director of Consumers Products Firm in Argentina. It is to be noted that this opportunity would result in a promotion of Mr. Olivera and would result in the development of his management and global skills. However, it is to be noted if Mr. Olivera accepts the designation of manufacturing director in Argentina, he will be required to stay out of his country for long periods. Mr Olivera had always given priority to his work and had neglected his family due to which he got divorced. If Mr. Olivera accepts the promotion and moves to Argentina, it can be stated that he would become even more distant from his son and daughter. Therefore he is left with two options either to move up the hierarchy of the company or choose to be satisfie d with his present designation and stay close to his family. The pros and cons of each option It can be stated that if Mr. Olivera chooses to accept the promotion and move to Argentina as the manufacturing director of CPF, it would be a great opportunity for him develop his management and global leadership skills. It can also be stated that the opportunity presented before Mr. Olivera is a onetime opportunity considering the fact that Mr. Olivera is forty six years of age and most of other executives of CPF who had accepted such offers were ten to fifteen years younger to him. However, it is important to mention that if Mr. Olivera chooses to seize the opportunity and accepts the promotion he would be leaving behind his family in Portugal and become even more distant to his family. However, it is to be noted that if Mr. Olivera chooses to ignore the opportunity of the promotion and stays in Portugal as the senior manager of the factory of CPF, he would be able to stay close to his family. Mr. Olivera had been giving his work priority and had been neglecting his family. He had been divorced due the same reason. It can be noted that if Mr Olivera is very fond of his children and considers them the most important things in his life. How to take the decision? According to the Utilitarianism theory, it can be stated that the best action to be taken by any individual depends on the utility obtained by the same[1]. It is to be noted that the utility is measured by the feeling emotional wellbeing and sentiment[2]. Thus, it can be noted that the decision to be taken by Mr. Olivera must be based on the utility of the outcome of the decision. The decision to be taken by Mr. Olivera must take into consideration the emotional wellbeing of him. The decision must also be based on the mental satisfaction of the aforementioned party. If he chooses to seize the opportunity of the promotion he will make his way up the hierarchy of the management and will receive the satisfaction of becoming the manufacturing director of the company, however if he chooses to stay in his place of residence he will be close to his family. The latter can create a sense of wellbeing in him. The decision to be taken by him must be evaluated very carefully considering the afor ementioned provisions. With whom he should discuss his options? The decision of whether to seize the opportunity to move to Argentina and accept the promotion is to be discussed with the family members of Mr. Olivera. He must communicate and discuss with his family members the options available to him and the consequences of the same. Since it is a very important decision to be made, he must also consider discussing his options with the management and the directors of the company. He must communicate with them the things he has taken into consideration and while choosing his options. Ways to prioritize his needs and wants when evaluating his options It can be stated that the he should prioritize his needs while evaluating his options. He should consider the consequences of his options and the effect of the same on him[3]. He must evaluate whether he wants to stay away from his family or seize the one time opportunity of his life of becoming the manufacturing director of the company he has worked so hard for. However according to the Utilitarianism theory he must evaluate which option gives him the most utility or satisfaction[4]. He must give more priority to the option, which gives him the utmost utility and satisfaction, and evaluate his decision based on the same. What I would do if I were Olivera In my opinion, it can be said that if I were Olivera, I would have given more priority to my family and for once place it above my work. Considering my time span left in the company I would not have opted for the promotion. At the age of forty six, I would not have wanted to stay away from my native country provided that I had never stayed away from home except on a few occasions. Giving more priority to his work had cost Olivera his marriage. I would not have jeopardized my remaining by choosing work over family again. I would have communicated my decision of rejection of the promotion to the authorities of the company stating the reason for rejection of the proposal. Reference List: Arntzenius, Frank. "Utilitarianism, decision theory and eternity."Philosophical Perspectives28.1 (2014): 31-58. Chekola, Mark. "Utilitarianism."Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer Netherlands, 2014. 6881-6883. DeMarr, Beverly J., and Suzanne C. De Janasz.Negotiation and dispute resolution. Prentice Hall, 2013. Beckerman, Wilfred. "Utilitarianism: The Search for an Overriding Value."Economics as Applied Ethics. Springer International Publishing, 2017. 93-1 Arntzenius, Frank. "Utilitarianism, decision theory and eternity."Philosophical Perspectives28.1 (2014): 31-58. Beckerman, Wilfred. "Utilitarianism: The Search for an Overriding Value."Economics as Applied Ethics. Springer International Publishing, 2017. 93-103. DeMarr, Beverly J., and Suzanne C. De Janasz.Negotiation and dispute resolution. Prentice Hall, 2013. Chekola, Mark. "Utilitarianism."Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer Netherlands, 2014. 6881-6883.